Climate change, global warming, ozone depletion...
It seems these expressions are so popular and commonly used to, that even hard-parting nightclub goers hear this stuff while enjoying lovely tunes.
Avoiding sophistications of super-professional texts, some thoughts on a widely-discussed climate-change-linked carbon emission topic had been submitted to the Climate Change Minister-and context might surely be of some interest to anyone - especially, those thinking that paying more brings about better results definitely.
COMMENTS on EMISSIONS TRADING SCHEME DISCUSSION PAPER by Michael Kerjman MIEAust CPEng MISMS MMVEA(USA) MBDP(UK) etc.
Had since the dawn of a planetary history all used to producing any page of a response to the Discussion Paper gradually-exhausted-natural-resources' and linked pollution's volumes integrated, an enormous amount of carbon emissions released requires obviously a sharp to the point reality-based applied engineering approach to climate-change-initiated fears round a globe intensified steadily by some influential administrators, lawyers and educators benefiting from playing English professionally while, in this case, attempting to impose a next financial burden on others predominantly.
Of climate-change-related papers and carbon-trading-scheme speculations following the produce on a topic up to date, the most impression is a total sin evil humans have been committing by ruining a planet with their activities and even their mere presence on.
However, it is not so simplistic: gravity, electro-magnetism and geo-mechanical characteristics are inextricably linked and mutually transforming each other features as solar radiation and space rays add significantly to a global reality where ozone depletion and climate change have been natural processes following the unstoppable deteriorating of the biosphere being accustomed.
Therefore, decreasing industrial gas exhaust in environment is an issue humanity-protecting rather than preventing a geo-cosmic destruction.
Therefore, a local effect of emissions cannot be tackled by paying the distant outsiders for deploying their quote on emitting into the universe somewhere.
Therefore, the more geographically distant carbon-dollar recipient(s) is (are) - the more extensive donor's exchange can originate in situ de facto.
Therefore, in a legal environment of a vogue enterprise collective responsibility, money itself substitutes neither clean-up technology nor an air quality itself.
Therefore, in any locality, nationally, a local air quality reflects foremost a local level of industrialization, local types of technological processes and local clean-up techniques whilst none can and does clean atmospheric air at any level and to any degree anywhere around the Earth.
Therefore, demanding cash for re-saleable, money-convertible atmospheric exhaust licensing is akin selling the shares for using an air, which was so far free for use even in the most feudal Dark Ages being already supposedly overcame by human rights delighted modern societies.
Therefore, a physics open object shared universally, Earth atmosphere hardly behaves utterly-predictably, which to some extent explains already misfortunes of the introduced pilot emissions trading schemes in Canada and the European Union.
Therefore, a point of following into someone's misguiding footsteps is unclear if no coherent scientific opinion regarding a climate change outcome existed: planetary cooling rather than global warming had more recently been seen as a realm of a next epoch on the Earth.
Therefore, against extremes -either warming or cooling oncoming, planetary strata are a natural protector, and shifting planetary magnetic poles indicate dramatic changes in global environment upon all the natural history known.
Therefore, an accumulated-carbon-emissions-future-efficient utilization is not a-stand-alone-complex, but a vital practical task sustaining a very existence of generations oncoming, a constituent of and a major concern for adaptation to the inevitable, which is a global climate change.
What is next?
A responsible signatory to unrealistic climate change international treaties should be prepared to a factual extortion of own national resources under umbrella of "an international emission trading scheme" if related international pacts do not collapse till 2030 naturally.
At a national level such a "trading" is a next dollar turnover around itself, stimulating inflation and tackling no environment protection problem but a playground for worldwide viciously hypothesising only the nature's decrees.
Perhaps, practically enforcing anti-smoking legislation in public places will bring about much more positive results, both financial and clean air/climate change related than an overseas-minded nonsense of an atmospheric air trading in any form at any level.
On a usual basis of "pay-as-you-go", accumulating carbon emissions for further utilization is seen to be a realistic path for the future national well-being on a way of an adaptation of natural terrestrial developments.
Just Do IT
15 years ago